マヌー・ベネットのインスタグラム(manubennett) - 7月31日 22時42分

Forming global debates over the Internet is a phenomenon in understanding or misunderstanding balance within society. Effort to form unity provides argument for division. In terms of physics balancing act begins with the fulcrum supporting weights on either side. With even or odd weight applied either side, the see saw tilts. BTW The word see saw derives from Latin "This or that" In terms of using physics to find social balance, first we must decide how we as humans end up on either side of the see saw? Are we pro or anti the sentiment. In solution methodology to find balance are we to try to reach or become the fulcrum, creating equilibrium or try to distribute the weight evenly either side creating balance? What I find interesting & hopeful is that there is an answer to this defined by physics!

[BIHAKUEN]UVシールド(UVShield)

portia_geneoa I guess it depends on the opposing forces to each side. Chamberlain tried to find a balance to avoid war but the result was morally imbalanced. Just how much inhumanity do we tolerate to create a balance? It becomes damn tricky when what we consider to be inhumane is part of a culture, ie whale hunting in Scandinavia, lopping off hands in Saudi for theft, caning in Indonesia for spitting on the sidewalk.

bernadettebossi Win-win negotiation can enable both parties in a discussion to feel that they have made a satisfactory deal, and that neither is the "loser." ... "Principled negotation" is a common win-win strategy, devised by Roger Fisher and William Ury, that can help you to negotiate an agreement in a civil way

dldc3 When talking about social balance, the first thing that comes to my mind is that countries (in general) need to prop up poor institutional infrastructure - both political and legal because, in my opinion, it is the main fulcrum needed to achieve real balance. Greetings from Spain!

meredith_yabsley History gives us a clear view of the conduct of humanity. It’s all been said and done in the past. We need someone like yourself Jon, someone who respects history enough to do and think ‘it’ differently. X

dadandbabs So what is your argument towards the internet? You describe a tipping scale but what os the argument for the matter? I havent been following the news lately

uhc.art I translated the text, I hope I understood him 🙈 Is not it always about the harmony of balance? No matter where, no matter when and with whom?

>> 飲む日焼け止め！「UVシールド」を購入する